CHASE BANK BAIT and SWITCHING, AGAIN! WHITE HOUSE, BARACK OBAMA, and REPUBLICANS DO NOTHING.

It seems as if Chase Bank is going to do whatever it wants to do when it comes to dealing with their credit card customers. Los Angeles Times Writer David Lazarus exposes the latest and ugliest Chase Bank Bait and Switch Swindle of the american consume as they change flat rate interest rate cards to variable rate instead, without even offering an OPT OUT option!

Just where is Oprah Winfrey, Suze Orman, David Ramsey, our Celebrities, Politicians, Sports Star Athletes, or 60 MINUTES when it comes to protecting the very people who support their media careers by watching their shows and buying their sponsor's products?

Are you still buying products from people who won't step up and protect the american consumer from the Likes of Chase Bank?

HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.

PLEASE VOTE IN THE LA TIMES IS CHASE BANK EVIL POLL.

Please vote in the LA Times Chase Bank Poll. The article by Dave Lazarus is pretty good, the headline is spectacular, but there are a couple of unfortunate omissions. Mr. Lazarus implies that Chase has defeated the lawsuits against them when they have not by stating that what Chase Bank has done is despicable but possibly legal (the lawsuits are still ongoing).

Mr. Lazarus does not mention opting out. However, the mentioning of bait and switch is very strong and I am very happy that was included in the actual headline of the article, wow!

I find it frustrating that the LA Times IS NOT ALLOWING COMMENTS on this article, a disturbing trend in my opinion. However, to the LA Times and Mr. Lazarus credit, they did put a poll in this article and Chase is just getting pasted! Please join in the fun and vote. It actually does matter.

Although comments are enabled beneath the article, Mr. Lazarius can also be reached by email, which I think is very cool (I always recommend the ultimate in politeness when emailing a writer).

Apparently, internet news etiquette is either comments can be left but the writer may not be contacted, or if comments cannot be left, the writer can be contacted via the internet. That seems to be the case for most articles left on newspaper websites, except for the AP, which appears to not allow either contact with the writers of their articles, nor can comments be left. Yeesh.

HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.

Los Angeles Times Liz Pulliam Weston, Credit Card Industry apologist and apparently proud of it, and no way to contact her either!

What absolutely trashy and incorrect information Liz Pulliam Weston doles out on a regular basis for the Los Angeles Times about credit cards in her money talk column.

I feel badly for anybody who writes this person expecting to get some kind of help. Even worse is the realization nothing will come of it but an explanation as to why the credit card companies can do what they want, and you can't do anything about it.

Check out the horrible information Ms. Weston gave out recently in her column about Chase Bank and their 10 dollar monthly banking fee.

What makes the answer so horrible is that Ms. Weston is basically saying that a credit card company can offer a customer a 3.99 life of the loan offer, and even though the actual monthly interest rate can climb to 10% once the 10 dollar a month fee is added in, that somehow this is entirely legal.

lol, as most of us know, Chase bank rescinded the 10 dollar a month fee specifically because on their own billing system it showed the 3.99 interest rate had suddenly jumped to a much higher rate depending on how much balance still remained to be paid.  The lower the remaining balance, the higher the overall interest rate would jump up to.

Sadly, the LA times has chosen to insulate Ms. Weston from all forms of informational responses.  Not only can Ms. Weston make incorrect statements in her article, nobody can contact her or comment on her articles in an effort to explain that which she does not understand. 

Nice job LA times. How is that Chase Bank advertising money flowing in these days?  It sure looks like it must be coming in nice and steady for you to put out disinformation that protects the credit card companies.

Nowhere does Liz  Pulliam Weston mention the idea of opting out of the credit card agreement after Chase Bank has changed the terms.  Liz Pulliam Weston also does not mention that Chase Bank DID NOT ALLOW the customer the right to opt out of this change in terms in her column by ignoring the concept of opting out all together!

Lies that protect illegal banking methods while trying to mollify the reader into accepting anything unethical that the banking community attempts to do is a horrible, filthy way the Los Angeles Times has chosen to fill it's newspaper space with. 

Help Daily-Protest.com grow.CHASE BANK PROTEST-DAY 9. HOW YOU CAN HELP THE DAILY-PROTEST.com CREDIT CARD PROTEST GROW WITHOUT EVEN PROTESTING YOURSELF, AND IT IS FREE.